The submission goes in on Thursday. What can you actually prove?
Environmental Compliance Reporting Platform
Every site. Every quarter. Evidenced.
Monitoring, waste, emissions and incidents held against the clearance conditions they answer to — assembled into the report DM-ED and DECCA expect.
Sign inEvaluated against
UAE Cabinet Order 12/2006
Ambient air quality
DM Technical Guideline 9
Noise limits by receptor
DM Water Quality Objectives
Marine discharge
Federal Decree-Law 11/2024
Climate reporting
The problem
Dust and noise readings sit in one spreadsheet, waste transfer notes in another, the clearance conditions in a PDF nobody has opened since the permit was issued. Each quarter it is assembled by hand — and the gaps surface when someone official asks, not before.
Every quarter begins by rebuilding the same picture from four places.
Clearance expiry and NOC conditions live in someone's head, and leave when they do.
The report states a finding. Reconstructing what it rested on is a separate job.
What it will not claim
A compliance report is only worth the reliance you can place on it. That means saying plainly when something was not measured.
A period in which nothing was measured is reported as pending review — never as compliant. No exceedances is not the same as no risk.
A reading is judged against a stated limit and carries the reference with it, so the finding can be checked rather than taken on trust.
A laboratory result reported as “<0.005” is kept as written. Rounding it to zero would assert a measurement nobody made.
How it works
Built for the consultant
Self-monitoring under DM-ED and DECCA is a continuous obligation, not a quarterly scramble. This is the record that makes it one.
Sign in